historic sandstone restoration
August 25, 2025

Historic Stone Building Restoration in Chicago’s Gold Coast

The Story Behind a Landmark on East Schiller Street

Historic stone buildings have long defined the streetscape of Chicago’s Gold Coast. One notable example is a late 19th-century brownstone residence located on East Schiller Street—a structure that captures the lasting value of traditional masonry and expert craftsmanship. Originally built in the 1890s in the robust style now categorized among historic architectural styles, this home had suffered substantial deterioration. Natural weathering and previous, incompatible repair attempts had compromised both its decorative and structural components. This case study highlights the process of historic stone building restoration, focusing on a property that blends architectural significance with personal history. Through a carefully planned and executed program of stone masonry repair methods, the original character of the building was not only preserved but carefully reestablished. The restoration approach combined hands-on craftsmanship with analysis-based material selection, offering insight into how to restore old stone buildings effectively and responsibly.

The Architectural Role of Sandstone in Historic Homes

Sandstone has long been prized in architectural design for its warm tones, intricate textures, and ability to support both decorative and structural applications. In historic home construction—especially in the late 1800s—it was commonly used in urban residences and public buildings for its durability and natural beauty. Its range of earthy colors and ease of carving made it a preferred material for decorative stonework.

The East Schiller Street brownstone exemplifies this trend. Among the building’s most unique features is its arched entrance, originally adorned with a decorative stonework relief of a woman’s face. According to local architectural lore, the face was modeled after the original owner’s daughter—a personal story carved into the stone and echoed in many historic home renovations in Chicago that aimed to blend symbolism with craftsmanship.

This tradition of incorporating individual identity into architectural ornament is part of what makes these buildings irreplaceable. Today, the restored face once again crowns the entrance—an emblem of the building’s past, brought into the present through skilled stonework. It stands as a subtle yet compelling testament to the lasting power of thoughtful preservation. Visitors to Chicago’s Gold Coast can still walk East Schiller Street and see this restored decorative masonry feature for themselves.

Why Stone Facade Restoration Becomes Essential

Despite its strengths, sandstone—like many materials used in historic homes—has vulnerabilities that emerge over time. Its natural porosity and sensitivity to moisture make it particularly prone to weathering in climates like Chicago’s. Over decades, exposure to freeze-thaw cycles, pollution, and water infiltration can lead to surface erosion, deep cracking, and misalignment
of the masonry system. Restoration becomes critical when these issues are compounded by inappropriate past repairs—such as using incompatible mortars or sealants—which accelerate damage rather than slow it. This was the case with the stone facade restoration in Chicago at East Schiller Street, where over a century of environmental exposure and poor interventions had led to serious deterioration.

The building exhibited:

  • Surface scaling and material loss
  • Cracks running through the stone units
  • Staining from moisture migration
  • Misaligned masonry and early signs of settlement

The damage went far beyond aesthetics. It threatened the ability of the stonework to properly shed water, maintain structural stability, and preserve its original form. In this context, masonry repair for historic homes isn’t optional—it’s a necessary intervention to safeguard both the function and legacy of the structure.

Condition Assessment of the Historic Building

Before beginning any stone facade restoration in Chicago, a thorough an assessment phase was undertaken to document the existing condition of the building and developing a tailored plan for intervention. This diagnostic process formed the backbone of the project, ensuring that each repair and replacement decision was grounded in hard data—not assumptions. The goal was clear: capture the full extent of deterioration, identify its causes, and design a conservation strategy that prioritized minimal intervention and material compatibility. This allowed the team to avoid unnecessary replacement while preserving as much original stone as possible.

The assessment included the following:

  • Visual Survey – Systematic observation of surface damage and
    structural movement
  • Photographic Documentation – High-resolution imagery to establish a
    visual baseline
  • Material Testing and Stone Analysis – Mineralogical and petrographic
    testing of existing stone units
  • Damage Mapping and Prioritization – Detailed mapping of cracks,
    erosion and joint failures

The resulting technical record informed every aspect of the restoration, including material matching, mortar formulation, and installation sequencing. By aligning with established stone masonry repair methods, the team ensured the project followed best practices consistent with the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for historic preservation.

 

Techniques for Restoring Historic Masonry

Restoring a historic stone building goes far beyond replacing damaged units. It requires deep technical knowledge of the stone’s physical properties, awareness of historical construction methods, and sensitivity to environmental impacts. At the East Schiller Street residence, the restoration team developed a custom methodology that merged traditional craftsmanship with contemporary material science, allowing for lasting, visually seamless results.

1. Masonry Cleaning

Proper cleaning is a critical first step in any decorative stonework repair. At this project site, cleaning was designed to eliminate environmental staining and biological growth while preserving the stone’s natural patina and tooling.

  • Low-Pressure Steam Cleaning – Used to gently remove soot, grime, and organic matter without damaging the stone or altering its surface absorption properties.
  • Non-Ionic Detergents – Applied only in areas where deposits were resistant, ensuring no chemical interaction with the mineral matrix of the stone.
  • Dry Brushing – Reserved for intricate carved areas where detail and texture were especially vulnerable to abrasion. Importantly, aggressive methods such as sandblasting, chemical washes, or high-pressure systems were strictly avoided, in keeping with established historic masonry preservation guidelines.

2. Repair and Stone Fabrication

A major challenge was sourcing replacement stone that matched the original red sandstone was used in the 1890s. Since no local quarry produced an exact match, the team turned to lab-fabricated stone, guided by:

  • Mineralogical and petrographic analysis to recreate a material nearly identical in porosity, grain size, compressive strength, and weathering behavior.
  • Custom-designed lime-based mortar, formulated to allow breathability, thermal movement, and long-term compatibility with the surrounding masonry. The mortar was carefully color-matched and tooled to match the historic joint profiles.

These measures ensured that all replacement work would integrate naturally with the original stone facade restoration—both visually and structurally.

3. Recreating Decorative Carved Features

The building’s most distinctive feature—the female stone face crowning the arched entrance—had been worn beyond recognition due to prolonged weathering and earlier repair attempts. Its restoration required a careful balance of historical accuracy, material compatibility, and skilled craftsmanship.

  • Archival photographs and period references were used to guide the
    reconstruction of missing details with as much historical fidelity as possible.
  • Full-scale drawings served as templates for accurately capturing the
    feature’s original proportions and form.
  • Skilled conservators, trained in traditional restoration methods,
    reproduced the element using a compatible material carefully selected to
    match the color, texture, tooling, and weathering behavior of the original
    stone.

The entire reconstruction was carried out on site, directly within the original masonry opening. Performing the work in situ allowed the team to continually reference the surrounding stonework, ensuring precise alignment, consistent depth, and seamless visual integration. This approach helped preserve the architectural integrity of the entrance and reinforced the overall continuity of the historic facade.

4. Stone Installation and Repointing

Installation of the restored elements followed strict guidelines to prevent damage to the surrounding historic fabric.

  • Manual Stone Removal – Each deteriorated unit was extracted by
    hand to prevent vibration damage.
  • Historically Accurate Repointing – Narrow mortar joints were tooled
    to match original profiles, restoring the façade’s visual hierarchy.
  • Removal of Unsympathetic Repairs – Cement-based patches from past work were removed and replaced with lime mortar to restore the wall’s natural moisture performance and appearance.

All proposed treatments adhered to guidelines established by the U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service Preservation Briefs.

Challenges, Custom Repairs & Material Matching

Every historic stone building restoration presents unique challenges, and the project on East Schiller Street was no exception. From missing design documentation to material incompatibilities and structural instability, the team faced multiple obstacles that required a flexible but rigorous approach grounded in stone masonry repair methods and established preservation principles.
One of the most pressing issues was the advanced deterioration of the original façade. Much of the decorative stonework, including complex carved features, had eroded to the point of being unrecognizable. Archival research conducted at the Chicago Historical Society yielded only a handful of usable references, making it necessary for the restoration team to analyze comparable historic architectural styles, particularly Romanesque buildings from the same era. The centerpiece of this challenge was the restoration of the carved female face at the archway’s apex. Once a defining element of the building’s entrance, the sculpture had been severely damaged by time and previous
inappropriate repairs. The team used historic photographs, combined with hand-rendered design drawings, to reconstruct the figure with precision. The final carving was produced using traditional techniques that aligned with the building’s original materiality and detailing.

Structural movement added another layer of complexity. Over time, shifting masonry had created points of vulnerability, particularly around the main entrance. To safely proceed, the team installed temporary supports to stabilize the surrounding stone while allowing for localized intervention. These supports ensured that the restoration of deteriorated or displaced stone units could be performed without jeopardizing the integrity of adjacent sections.

Material compatibility remained a cornerstone of the project. Since the specific red sandstone originally used in the 1890s was no longer quarried, specialists developed custom-fabricated replacement stone based on detailed mineralogical and petrographic analysis. This ensured the new stone matched the original in color, texture, porosity, and compressive strength—preventing issues like differential aging or moisture retention. Equally critical was the development of a compatible mortar.

A custom lime-based mortar was formulated to provide sufficient vapor permeability, compressive strength, and flexibility, all of which are essential for masonry repair for historic buildings. This not only ensured visual continuity but also preserved the wall’s ability to manage moisture naturally. Throughout the process, all work adhered to the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation, which emphasize reversibility, material compatibility, and documentation. This framework enabled the team to make carefully considered interventions that honored the building’s original
construction while ensuring long-term performance.

The project on East Schiller Street exemplifies how restoring decorative stone features and stabilizing aging masonry can bring a landmark back to life—not through approximation, but through accuracy, respect for historical integrity, and expert execution. By combining evidence-based restoration planning, skilled artisanship, and high-quality materials, the team reestablished both the architectural identity and structural stability of this 19th-century residence.

This restoration is more than an aesthetic achievement—it serves as a model for how to restore old stone buildings with integrity. With ongoing maintenance, facades like this one can continue to enrich the urban fabric of Chicago for generations to come.

FAQs on Stone Restoration and Masonry Conservation

1. How is a historic sandstone facade restored?

Restoring a historic sandstone facade begins with a detailed condition assessment and material analysis. Specialists document deterioration, clean the surface using non-invasive techniques, and replace damaged sections with lab-fabricated stone that matches the original in color, porosity, and grain. Lime-based mortar is formulated to support moisture transfer and structural flexibility. Carved details are recreated by hand using traditional masonry methods, ensuring the restoration complies with historic preservation standards.

2. Why is it important to match original stone and mortar in historic restoration?

Using materials that match the original stone and mortar is essential for both visual continuity and structural compatibility. Mismatched stone can create sharp contrasts and lead to uneven weathering, while incompatible mortar may trap moisture or cause cracking. Matching porosity, compressive strength, and aging characteristics ensures long-term durability and helps maintain the authenticity of the historic building.

3. What causes sandstone to deteriorate in historic buildings?

Sandstone deterioration is commonly caused by moisture infiltration, freeze-thaw cycles, air pollution, biological growth, and the use of non-breathable repair materials. These factors can lead to surface erosion, scaling, deep cracks, mortar failure, and even structural instability. Preventative maintenance and proper restoration techniques are key to extending the life of historic sandstone facades.

4. How are missing or damaged decorative stone features recreated?

Recreating missing or eroded decorative stone elements involves a combination of historical research, archival photography, and architectural analysis. Full-scale drawings and 3D models are developed to guide the carving process. Skilled stone masons then hand-carve the features using compatible stone types and period-appropriate tools. This process restores the building’s original design details and contributes to its historical accuracy.

Other articles

Restoring the Hackley Public Library Mosaic: A Masterclass in Historic Stone Floor Preservation

Case Study, Mosaic & Tiles Restoration

Historic Revival in Chicago: Restoring the Iconic Limestone Entryway at W Pierce Ave

Case Study, Masonry Restoration, Stone Restoration
historic sandstone restoration

Historic Stone Building Restoration in Chicago’s Gold Coast

Case Study, Masonry Restoration